Federated Learning for Privacy-Preserving Predictive Maintenance inMulti-Site Industrial IoT Networks: Architecture, Convergence Analysis,and Benchmark Evaluation

Authors

Keywords:

Federated Learning, Industry 4.0, RUL Prediction, Industrial IoT, Predictive Maintenance

Abstract

Predictive maintenance (PdM) in multi-site industrial settings requires training machine learning models on condition monitoring data that is distributed across facilities operated by competing organisations, making
centralised data aggregation infeasible due to privacy, intellectual property, and regulatory constraints. Federated learning (FL) offers a paradigm-shift solution by enabling collaborative model training without raw data exchange: each site trains locally and shares only model gradient updates with a central aggregation server. This paper presents FedPdM, a federated learning architecture tailored for industrial IoT predictive maintenance, incorporating: (i) FedAvg-based global aggregation with adaptive client
weighting proportional to local dataset quality; (ii) a non-IID robustness mechanism using Scaffold variance reduction to address heterogeneous failure mode distributions across sites; and (iii) differential privacy noise injection at the gradient level to provide formal ε-DP guarantees. FedPdM is evaluated on the CMAPSS turbofan engine degradation benchmark and a proprietary 12 site industrial compressor dataset, achieving Remaining Useful Life prediction RMSE of 14.3 cycles (CMAPSS FD001 subset) comparable to centralised baseline RMSE of 13.8 cycles  while providing (ε=2.1, δ=10⁻⁵) differential privacy at a  ommunication overhead of 2.3 MB per round. Convergence is achieved in 38 rounds across 12 heterogeneous clients, confirming practical viability for real industrial multi-site deployment.

References

[1] P. Boobalan, S. P. Ramu, Q. V. Pham, K. Dev, S. Pandya, P. K. R. Maddikunta, T. R. Gadekallu, and T. Huynh-The, "Fusion of federated learning and industrial Internet of Things: A survey," Comput. Netw., vol. 212, pp. 109048, Jul. 2022.

[2] B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. A. y Arcas, "Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data," in Proc. AISTATS, pp. 1273–1282, 2017.

[3] W. Yang, Y. Yang, Z. Zhou, C. Ye, J. Han, Q. Liu, and L. Hanzo, "Adaptive optimization federated learning enabled digital twins in industrial IoT," J. Ind. Inf. Integr., vol. 41, pp. 100645, Sep. 2024.

[4] B. Farahani and A. K. Monsefi, "Smart and collaborative industrial IoT: A federated learning and data space approach," Digit. Commun. Netw., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 23–41, Feb. 2023.

[5] J. Ahn, Y. Lee, N. Kim, C. Park, and J. Jeong, "Federated learning for predictive maintenance and anomaly detection using time series data distribution shifts in manufacturing processes," Sensors, vol. 23, no. 17, pp. 7331, Aug. 2023.

[6] X. Ma, J. Zhu, Z. Lin, S. Chen, and Y. Qin, "A state-of-the-art survey on solving non-IID data in federated learning," Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 135, pp. 244–258, Oct. 2022.

[7] B. B. Sezer, H. Turkmen, and U. Nuriyev, "PPFchain: A novel framework privacy-preserving blockchain-based federated learning method for sensor networks," Internet of Things, vol. 22, pp. 100781, Jul. 2023.

[8] M. Hao, H. Li, X. Luo, G. Xu, H. Yang, and S. Liu, "Efficient and privacy-enhanced federated learning for industrial artificial intelligence," IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 6532–6542, Oct. 2020.

[9] A. R. Javed, M. Shahzad, S. ur Rehman, Y. B. Zikria, I. Razzak, Z. Jalil, and G. Xu, "Integration of blockchain technology and federated learning in vehicular (IoT) networks: A comprehensive survey," Sensors, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 4394, Jun. 2022.

[10] K. Hazra, M. Adhikari, S. Nandy, K. Doulani, and V. G. Menon, "Federated-learning-aided next-generation edge networks for intelligent services," IEEE Netw., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 56–64, May/Jun. 2022.

[11] M. Al-Quraan, L. Mohjazi, L. Bariah, A. Centeno, A. Zoha, K. Arshad, and M. A. Imran, "Edge-native intelligence for 6G communications driven by federated learning: A survey of trends and challenges," IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 957–979, Jun. 2023.

[12] P. Chhikara, R. Tekchandani, N. Kumar, M. Guizani, and M. M. Hassan, "Federated learning and autonomous UAVs for hazardous zone detection and AQI prediction in IoT environment," IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 8, no. 20, pp. 15456–15467, Jul. 2021.

[13] S. Banabilah, M. Aloqaily, E. Alsayed, N. Malik, and Y. Jararweh, "Federated learning review: Fundamentals, enabling technologies, and future applications," Inf. Process. Manag., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 103061, Nov. 2022.

[14] L. Shanmugam, R. Tillu, and M. Tomar, "Federated learning architecture: Design, implementation, and challenges in distributed AI systems," J. Knowl. Learn. Sci. Technol., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 371–384, 2023.

[15] G. Kaissis, M. R. Makowski, D. Rückert, and R. F. Braren, "End-to-end privacy preserving deep learning on multi-institutional medical imaging," Nat. Mach. Intell., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 473–484, Jun. 2021.

[16] Z. Liu, J. Guo, W. Yang, J. Fan, K. Y. Lam, and J. Zhao, "Privacy-preserving aggregation in federated learning: A survey," IEEE Trans. Big Data, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1–21, 2022.

[17] N. Rieke, J. Hancox, W. Li, F. Milletarì, H. R. Roth, S. Albarqouni, S. Bakas, M. N. Galtier, B. A. Landman, K. Maier-Hein, S. Ourselin, M. J. Sheller, R. M. Summers, A. Trask, D. Xu, M. Baust, and M. J. Cardoso, "The future of digital health with federated learning," npj Digit. Med., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 119, Sep. 2020.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Federated Learning for Privacy-Preserving Predictive Maintenance inMulti-Site Industrial IoT Networks: Architecture, Convergence Analysis,and Benchmark Evaluation. (2025). Aintelia Science Notes, 4(1), 9-14. https://journal.bauderpress.org.tr/index.php/asnj/article/view/83