Cooperation in Voluntary Tax Compliance and International Compliance Assurance Programme (ICAP)
Keywords:
tax compliance, cooperative compliance, tax evasion, tax avoidanceAbstract
The problem of taxpayers' tax compliance has existed since taxes first appeared on the historical stage. Tax compliance, which can be expressed in the most general sense as the fulfillment of taxpayers' obligations, is an important factor that should be evaluated in the background of tax losses and evasion. Since almost all states rely heavily on taxes as a source of public revenue, they have consistently sought to find measures to guarantee this compliance. Studies that focus at the responses of taxpayers to taxes and research into the underlying causes of tax incompatibility in this context. Based on this research, the concept of taxpayers' voluntary compliance has recently gained attention as a means of assuring tax compliance. It may be claimed that the International Compliance Assurance Programme (ICAP) developed by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is one of the most recent among several concepts and strategies to secure voluntary compliance. ICAP was developed utilising experience gained from "cooperative compliance" programs that have been in place for a while in some countries, focusing on the increase of cooperation between the taxpayer and the tax administration to ensure taxpayers' voluntary compliance with taxes. On the other hand, it represents the first effort and varies from the aforementioned domestic practices in that it brings compliance and cooperation to the international scale. In this respect, examining the background and current practice of ICAP, which is still in the pilot stage, together with its theoretical background is of great importance in terms of evaluating the future of the concept of cooperative compliance and making predictions about its development in the international arena.
References
Allingham, M.G. & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1, 323–338.
Björklund Larsen, L. (2016). Sweden: Failure of A Cooperative Compliance Project?. H2020-EURO-SOCIETY-2014.
Bronżewska, K. (2016). Cooperative Compliance: A New Approach to Managing Taxpayer Relations. Amsterdam, IBFD [e-book].
Calderón, J.M.C. (2018). The OECD International Compliance Assurance Programme : Just A New Multilateral An Cooperative Model of Tax Control For Multinational Enterprises?. Bulletin for International Taxation, 72(12), 690-703.
Christians, A., & Diniz Magalhães, T. (2020). Canada’s Experience with the ICAP. In: Co-operative Compliance and the OECD’s International Compliance Assurance Programme, Hein, R., & Russo, R. (Eds.). Kluwer Law International BV.
De Widt, D., & Oats, L. (2017). Risk Assessment in A Co-Operative Compliance Context: A Dutch–UK Comparison. British Tax Review, 2, 230-248.
Hein, R., & Russo, R. (Eds.). (2020). Co-operative Compliance and the OECD’s International Compliance Assurance Programme. Kluwer Law International BV.
Huiskers-Stoop, E., & Gribnau, H. (2019). Cooperative Compliance and the Dutch Horizontal Monitoring Model. Journal of Tax Administration, 5(1), 66-110.
Kim, K. (2021). The OECD's International Compliance Assurance Programme. ABA Tax Times, 39(3), 14-24.
Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus Voluntary Tax Compliance: The “Slippery Slope” Framework. Journal of Economic psychology, 29(2), 210-225.
Majdanska, Alicja (2021). Co-Operative Compliance and the OECD's International Compliance Assurance Programme. Intertax, 49(3), 303-307.
Marcovici, P. & Noked, N. (2021). Cooperative Compliance Program for Individuals and Trusts: A Proposal for a Compliance Passport. Journal of Tax Administration, 6(2), 33-59.
Martini, M. (2022). A Review of Brazil Approaches to Cooperative Compliance in Light of International Tax Practice and the OECD Concept. Intertax, 50(2 [pre-publication]).
Martini, M. & Russo, R. (2021). The International Compliance Assurance Programme: Review of the Full Programme, Bulletin for International Taxation, 75(4).
Martini, M. & Russo, R. (2019). The International Compliance Assurance Programme Reviewed: The Future of Co-operative Tax Compliance?. Bulletin for International Taxation, 73(9).
Murphy, K. (2004). The Role of Trust in Nurturing Compliance: A Study of Accused Tax Avoiders. Law and Human Behavior, 28(2), 187-209.
Noguera, J. A., Quesada, F. J. M., Tapia, E., & Llàcer, T. (2014). Tax Compliance, Rational Choice, and Social Influence: An Agent-Based Model. Revue Française de Sociologie, 55(4), 765-804.
OECD (2008). Study into the Role of Tax Intermediaries. <https://www.oecd.org/tax/administration/39882938.pdf> Date Accessed: 31.10.2022.
OECD (2013). Co-operative Compliance: A Framework: From Enhanced Relationship to Co-operative Compliance, Paris, OECD Publishing.
Srinivasan, T.N. (1973). Tax Evasion: A Model. Journal of Public Economics, 2(4): 339–346.
Taylor, N. (2003). Understanding Taxpayers Attitudes Through Understanding Taxpayers Identities. In V. Braithwaite (Ed.), Taxing Democracy: Understanding Tax Avoidance and Evasion. Aldershot, Ashgate, 71–92.
Torgler, B. (2007). Tax Compliance and Tax Morale: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.
Wenzel, M. (2005). Misperceptions of Social Norms about Tax Compliance: From Theory to Intervention. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 862-883.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hakkı Odabaş , İmran Arıtı Erdem (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.