Job Opportunities for Young Graduates through Engagement in Crowdsourcing Platforms in Uzbekistan
Keywords:
Crowdsourcing, youth employment, gig economy, open talent, open innovation, UzbekistanAbstract
In the last decade crowdworking has become a fast-developing source of employment and income for young people all over the world. With the growing portion of young generation in the total population Uzbekistan faces a challenging issue - to create job opportunities and ensure employment for the youth.
Globalization, widespread Internet connectivity and digitalization have created vast opportunities for local companies to replicate international success of crowdsourcing/crowdworking platforms by providing access to digital jobs. On the one hand, by addressing questions to a young talent pool companies can solicit valuable ideas for the new product/service development or fetch innovative solutions to their persistent problems. On the other hand, in addition to earning income the young crowds have the chance to enhance their employability, get a shortcut access to reputable employers and build their careers. This is especially important for younger undergraduates who may have limited access to jobs in traditional economy markets due to their lack of degree and prior experience as well as those residing in rural areas where number of employers is extremely low and high unemployment rates are persistent.
Multiple strands of global literature had focused on collaborative power of crowdsourcing platforms drastically changing the job market landscape and their impact on labor. As this phenomenon is relatively new and has not been widely applied in Uzbekistan, it is imperative to understand possible challenges that companies may face in leveraging this mechanism locally. This study thus aims to fill the literature gap by enhancing understating of the adoption barriers that crowdsourcing platforms could face in Uzbekistan in the framework of providing job opportunities. Identifying these hindrances and the underlying causes behind them can help companies properly design their crowdsourcing platforms and campaigns to ensure greater participation of potential contributors and job seekers.
Drawing on a survey of students and alumni of the international universities in Uzbekistan that aimed to assess the impact of incentives and task design on crowdsourcing participation in this study the authors have specifically focused on participation barriers. The conducted survey findings reveal that lack of trust is the main factor in decreased participation intention. Recommendations for companies, as well as policy makers are presented in the concluding section.
References
Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. (2012). Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 355-375. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0146
Bakici, T. (2020). Comparison of crowdsourcing platforms from social-psychological and motivational perspectives. International Journal of Information Management, 54 (102121). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102121
Bauer, M., & Gegehuber, M. (2015). Crowdsourcing: global search and the twisted roles of consumers and producers. Organization, 22(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508415585
Brabham, D. (2008). Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: an introduction and cases. International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856507084420
De Stefano, V. (2016). The rise of the ‘just-in-time workforce’: on-demand work, crowdwork and labour protection in the ‘gig-economy. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37 (3), 471-504. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2682602
Di Gangi, P., & Wasko, M. (2009). The co-creation of value: exploring user engagement in user-generated content websites. All Sprouts Content. 303. http://aisel.aisnet.org/sprouts_all/303
Ellmer, M., Gegenhuber, T., & Schüßler, E. (2019). Exploring Crowdworker Participation on Digital Work Platforms. Paper presented at Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.268
Faullant, R., Füller, J., & Hutter, K. (2017). Fair play: perceived fairness in crowdsourcing competitions and the customer relationship-related consequences. Management Decision, 1924-1941. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2017-0116
Feller, J., Finnegan, P., Hayes, J., & O’Reilly, P. (2012). ‘Orchestrating’ sustainable crowdsourcing: a characterisation of solver brokerages. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(3), 216–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2012.03.002
Franke, N., Klausberg, K., & Keinz, P. (2013). Does this sound like a fair deal? Antecedents and consequences of fairness expectations in the individual's decision to participate in firm innovation. Organization Science, 24(5), 1495-1516. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0794
Gerber, C. (2020). Community building on crowdwork platforms: autonomy and control of online workers? Competition and Change, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529420914472
Government Portal of the Republic of Uzbekistan (2024). Strategy “Uzbekistan - 2030. Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan ‘On the State Program for the Implementation of the Uzbekistan-2030 Strategy in the Year of Support for Youth and Business’. https://gov.uz/en/pages/2030_strategy/
Howe, J. (2006). The Rise of Crowdsourcing. Wired, 14. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html
Idowu, A., & Elbanna, A. (2020). Digital platforms of work and the crafting of career path: the crowdworkers’ perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 24, 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10036-1
Jo, H., & Bang, Y. (2023). Factors influencing continuance intention of participants in crowdsourcing. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10 (824). https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-02335-0
Ke, W., & Zhang, P. (2009). Motivations in open source software communities: the mediating role of effort intensity and goal commitment. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13(4), 39–66. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27751306
Kim, J., Nguyen, P., Weir, S., Guo, P., Miller, R., & Gajos, K. (2014). Crowdsourcing step-by-step information extraction to enhance existing how-to videos. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. 4017-4026. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2556986
Mazolla, E., Acur, N., Piazza, M., & Perrone, G. (2018). To own or not to own? A study on the determinants and consequences of alternative intellectual property rights arrangements in crowdsourcing for innovation contests. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(6), 908-929. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12467
O'Higgins, N., & Pinedo, L. (2022). Crowdwork for young people: risks and opportunities, ILO Working Paper, 50. https://doi.org/10.54394/HZGG6446
Roth, S., Kaivo-Oja, J., & Hirschmann, T. (2013). Smart regions: two cases of crowdsourcing for regional development. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 20(3), 272-285. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2013.056890
Sedighi, M., van Splunter, S., Brazier, F., van Beers, C., & Lukosch, S. (2016). Exploration of multi-layered knowledge sharing participation: the roles of perceived benefits and costs, Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(6), 1247-1267. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2016-0044
Suhada, T., Ford, J., Verreynne, M., & Indulska, M. (2021). Motivating individuals to contribute to firms’ non-pecuniary open innovation goals. Technovation, 102 (102233). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102233
Taeihagh, A. (2017). Crowdsourcing, sharing economies and development. Journal of Developing Societies, 33(2), 191-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X17710072
Ullah, A., Zhang, Q., & Ahmed, M. (2021). The influence of intellectual property rights protection on contribution efforts of participants in online crowdsourcing contests. Computers in Human Behavior, 123, Article 106869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106869
World Bank (2023). The World Bank Data Uzbekistan. https://data.worldbank.org/country/uzbekistan, https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/uzbekistan/overview#economy
Ye, H.J., & Kankanhalli, A. (2017). Solvers' participation in crowdsourcing platforms: examining the impacts of trust, and benefit and cost factors. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26, 101-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2017.02.001
Zakariah, Z., Janom, N., & Habibah Arshad, N. (2018). Low income community as crowd worker for crowdsourcing: issues, challenges and future direction. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.33), 65-70. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.33.23486
Zhao, Y., & Zhu, Q. (2012). Exploring the motivation of participants in crowdsourcing contest. International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2012. 5. 3976-3988. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288366574_Exploring_the_motivation_of_participants_in_Crowdsourcing_contest
Zheng, H., Li, D., & Hou, W. (2011). Task design, motivation, and participation in crowdsourcing contests. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(4), 57–88. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415150402
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yuliya Paramonova, Kamila Tashmatova (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.